Canada's hub for international affairs.

What Ever Happened to Petro Canada?

Anouk Dey | February 17, 2012

The rich… are led by an invisible hand to make nearly the same distribution of the necessities of life, which would have been, had the earth been divided into equal portions among all its inhabitants, and thus without intending it, without knowing it, advance the interest of society. (Adam Smith, The Theory of Moral Sentiments)

This week, OpenCanada joined The Economist, Ian Bremmer, and the other ambassadors of state capitalism to prove Adam Smith wrong. While there was disagreement over whether only the hands of the BRICs were becoming visible, all concurred that capitalism is becoming increasingly fettered by the state: global economic freedom is on the wane, the biggest companies in the world have names like Sinopec, China National Petroleum Corporation, and Japan Post Holdings.

And yet Canada remains a striking outlier. According to the Fraser Institute, economic freedom in this country is higher than in many of our peer countries, including the United States and the United Kingdom. Among countries with natural resources, we stick out like the oil sands in an Edward Burtynsky photograph. The graph below shows the ten countries with the greatest oil reserves in the world. Canada is the only one without a national oil company.

Shortly after the Keystone XL decision, Slate published an article titled “Saudi Arabia. Nigeria. Venezuela. Canada? Is our neighbor to the north becoming a jingoistic petro-state?” This graphic suggests otherwise.

Graphic by Cameron Tulk.

 

  • Arteest103

    Why no Norway? StatOil is majority-owned by the state/govt of Norway.

  • David

    Thanks for the link to the very interesting Slate article :-)

  • A sad commentary…..

    We should recall that Canadian taxpayers (thanks to then Prime Minister Trudeau) paid $120 dollars a share to buy the Belgian company Petrofina (then trading on the market at $40) to create PetroCanada (thereafter known as the Peoples’ Democratik Oil Company) in order to grab control from Alberta. This was seemingly done because he couldn’t stand to see what was the beginning of a power shift to the West.

    Look at the countries on the list above that do have national oil companies . How is that wealth the oil produces spread amongst the population in those countries? How democratic are they ? Do we really want the politicians to have that kind of decision making power in their hands?

    How could anyone even suggest we should join the ones on this list !

  • Mobarak21

    Because Norway’s oil reserves aren’t in the top 10 in the world.

  • Jb5405513

    Canada does not need a national oil company, we had one and it was sold by the government in power but the Petro Canada Act still stands and Canada receives $.02 or $.025 a Litre for all of the oil and gas that is produced in Canada on land or in the water. A nice piece of revenue for Canada, this was to pay for the formation of Petro Canada and buy the Oil companies that made up Petro Canada.